Longitudinal dynamics in frailty and incident all-cause dementia: a multicohort study

Scritto il 26/01/2026
da Yihong Ding

J Adv Res. 2026 Jan 24:S2090-1232(26)00051-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.026. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Frailty changes over time, but how these changes relate to the risk of dementia remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the temporal relationship between dynamic changes in frailty and incident all-cause dementia.

METHODS: This pooled analysis included adults aged ≥ 60 years from four prospective cohorts. Frailty was assessed using a modified Fried phenotype at two consecutive surveys, allowing the identification of longitudinal frailty transition patterns. The outcome was all-cause dementia, identified through active follow-up assessments or passive data collection. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from Cox proportional hazards analyses.

RESULTS: Among 15,897 participants (51.3% female, mean age: 66.9 years), 1015 developed incident dementia over 131,621.3 person-years of follow-up. An increased risk of dementia was observed among robust participants who progressed to pre-frail/frail status, compared to those with stable robustness (pooled HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06-2.47; I2 = 66.8%). Similarly, pre-frail participants who progressed to frail status exhibited a higher dementia risk compared to those who remained pre-frail (pooled HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48-2.34; I2 = 0.0%). Conversely, participants who recovered from pre-frail to robust status experienced a reduced dementia risk (pooled HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.76; I2 = 0.0%). A higher cumulative frailty score was related to a higher dementia risk (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.22-1.31; I2 = 0.0% per score increment). Participants whose frailty scores increased over time had a higher risk of dementia compared to those with stable scores (pooled HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.07-1.65; I2 = 75.5% per score increment), while those with decreasing scores showed a mitigated dementia risk (pooled HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.91; I2 = 0.0% per score decrement).

CONCLUSIONS: Progression in frailty was associated with an increased risk of dementia, while reversal of pre-frailty reduced the risk. Our results emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring and individualized interventions for managing frailty in older adults.

PMID:41587726 | DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.026