Curr Med Sci. 2026 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s11596-026-00236-2. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have confirmed the opioid-sparing and analgesic properties of perioperative esmolol, yet relevant clinical evidence specifically focusing on patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains scarce, and the spinal nociceptive mechanism underlying esmolol-induced pain relief has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the association between perioperative esmolol administration and early postoperative opioid demand in IHD patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery, and further explore the role of spinal 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)/5-HT signaling in incisional pain using a female rat plantar incision model.
METHODS: For the clinical retrospective cohort, eligible IHD patients were divided into esmolol-exposed and non-exposed groups balanced via 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was cumulative 24-h postoperative opioid consumption converted to intravenous morphine equivalents (IME); secondary endpoints included early Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid-related adverse events and perioperative cardiovascular safety indicators. In animal experiments, intrathecal esmolol or selective 5-HT antagonist RS127445 was delivered to the female rats with plantar incision, followed by detection of mechanical withdrawal thresholds and spinal 5-HT/5-HT expression.
RESULTS: After matching, 52 patients were included in each group. Perioperative esmolol was associated with a 3.0 mg reduction in 24 h IME (mean difference [MD] = -3.0, 95% CI [-4.9, -1.1], P = 0.002), alongside lower post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption (MD = -2.3, 95% CI [-4.2, - 0.3], P = 0.022) and decreased resting NRS scores in PACU (MD = -0.8, 95% CI [-1.3, -0.2], P = 0.006) and at postoperative 6 h (MD = -0.6, 95% CI [-1.1, -0.02], P = 0.043); no intergroup difference in NRS was observed at 24 h (P = 0.379). All opioid-related adverse events showed comparable incidence between groups (all P > 0.05). Intraoperative heart rate was significantly lower in the esmolol group (MD = -4.4 beats/min, 95% CI [-7.8, -1.0], P = 0.012), while intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) and major cardiovascular complications exhibited no between-group differences (all P > 0.05). In rats, the results revealed transiently elevated paw withdrawal mechanical thresholds after intrathecal esmolol (P < 0.05 at 5 and 10 min), accompanied by suppressed surgery-induced upregulation of spinal 5-HT and 5-HT protein (P < 0.05). Intrathecal RS127445 also significantly alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity at 1 h post-administration (P < 0.01), with loss of efficacy at 2 h (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative esmolol is associated with early opioid-sparing and mild relief of acute postoperative pain in IHD patients receiving elective non-cardiac surgery, without increasing cardiovascular risks, whereas this regimen fails to reduce opioid-associated side effects. Preclinical data suggest that spinal 5-HT/5-HT signaling contributes to incision-induced mechanical hyperalgesia and may mediate the transient analgesic effect of esmolol.
PMID:42490018 | DOI:10.1007/s11596-026-00236-2