Med Eng Phys. 2026 Jan 9;147(1). doi: 10.1088/1873-4030/ae1e76.
ABSTRACT
Aortic mechanical heart valves (MHVs) have been implanted for decades to treat aortic valve disease and remain a viable option when valve durability is prioritized. However, the non-physiological hemodynamics induced by MHVs may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations enable the analysis of the biomechanical interaction between MHVs and blood flow. This study presents a strongly coupled, boundary-fitted FSI framework for aortic MHVs, used to assess the impact of MHV design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics. Nine simulation scenarios were investigated, considering three commercially available MHVs and three idealized aortic geometries (one straight and two curved models). Overall, the framework proved to provide results for flow-rate waveforms, velocity fields, and leaflet kinematics aligning well with previous experimental and computational studies. The framework highlighted that: (i) MHV design influences velocity fields and large-scale vorticity transport in the aorta, with systolic differences among the three devices of up to 41% and 133% in average swirling strength and stretching, respectively; (ii) the straight aortic model underestimates systolic swirling strength (up to 56%) and stretching (up to 91%) compared to curved models. This FSI framework can support MHV development by analyzing different device designs and anatomical scenarios.
PMID:41642237 | DOI:10.1088/1873-4030/ae1e76