BMC Med. 2026 Mar 3. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-04747-6. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with heart failure (HF) who are treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). ED could lead to CRT non-responders by increasing endothelin-1 (ET-1) expression and inflammatory/oxidative stress markers.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Vericiguat is an anti-HF medication that may reduce inflammatory/oxidative stress, ET-1 expression, and improve endothelial function in ED-CRT non-responders, leading to better outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study enrolling ED-CRT non-responders treated with vericiguat (vericiguat users) versus those who did not receive vericiguat (non-vericiguat users). ED was diagnosed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD ≤ 7.1%) of the brachial artery. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical assessments (inflammatory markers and ET-1) were performed at baseline and at 12 months. The primary endpoints were normalization of endothelial function (FMD > 7.1%) and CRT response at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included changes in inflammatory/oxidative stress markers, ET-1 levels, and clinical outcomes (HF hospitalizations, cardiac, and all-cause mortality).
RESULTS: A total of 289 ED-CRT non-responders were included, of whom 81 received vericiguat (vericiguat users) and 208 did not receive vericiguat (nonusers). At 1-year follow-up, vericiguat users vs. non-users demonstrated significant improvement in New York Heart Association class, 6-min walking test, and left ventricular remodeling (p < 0.05). Vericiguat users vs. non-users showed a significant reduction in inflammatory/oxidative stress biomarkers, B-type natriuretic peptide, and ET-1 (p < 0.05). At the end of follow-up, a lower rate of vericiguat users versus nonusers was under treatment with loop diuretics, aldosterone blockers, and sodium-glucose-transporter 2 inhibitors (p < 0.05). At follow-up end, a higher rate of vericiguat users vs. nonusers showed normalization of endothelial function (30 (37%) vs. 21 (10.1%), p < 0.05) and restored CRT responders (28 (34.6%) vs. 27 (13%), p < 0.05). At 1-year follow-up, the normalization of endothelial function was predicted by left-ventricle ejection fraction (0.42, CI 95% [0.02-0.72]) and vericiguat (4.35, CI 95% [2.45-7.70]). The CRT responders' outcome was predicted by vericiguat therapy (2.85, 95% CI [1.67-4.89]).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that vericiguat reduces ED and enhances the response to CRT in prior non-responders by significantly lowering inflammatory/oxidative stress markers and ET-1.
PMID:41776499 | DOI:10.1186/s12916-026-04747-6