Int Angiol. 2025 Dec;44(6):497-502. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05474-4.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, day case peripheral endovascular interventions have gained momentum due to constantly optimizing results, based on technological and pharmacological advancements. Despite this, some hospitals, especially in rural areas with limited access to the emergency services, have not fully adopted this model. We evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after endovascular procedures in north wales hospitals.
METHODS: A study was conducted of patients who underwent day-case peripheral arterial endovascular interventions during two distinct 12-month periods: April 2019 to March 2020 and April 2021 to March 2022. Data were sourced from a prospectively maintained interventional radiology database. We defined procedural technical success as the successful distal arterial access and crossing of the target lesion. The primary endpoint was safe same-day discharge, and the secondary endpoint was any adverse event related to the intervention. Patient's demographics, clinical information (including indication: claudication versus critical limb ischemia), primary procedure details, technical success, procedural complications, and unplanned admissions were recorded. Patient's records were evaluated at a minimum of 12 months post procedure.
RESULTS: Over 24-month period, 221 patients underwent 237 peripheral arterial interventions as day case. The mean age was 70 years with male female ratio of 2:1. The indications for intervention were claudication (55%) and critical limb ischemia (45%). The mean distance to hospital from home address was 23.6 kilometers. The most common artery undergoing treatment was the superficial femoral artery (51%). The procedure technical success rate was 90%. There were 12 (5%) complications with three (1.3%) patients requiring open surgery. The unplanned hospital admissions rate was 7.2%. The primary endpoint of safe same-day discharge was achieved in 92.8% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Same day discharge following peripheral endovascular interventions is safe and feasible even in a rural setting. With a low rate of complications and unplanned admissions this model of care can be adopted universally.
PMID:41416752 | DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05474-4

