Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2026 Apr 1;23(4):565-574. doi: 10.1093/annalsats/aaoaf048.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive emergency is characterized by end-organ dysfunction due to markedly elevated blood pressure. Although guidelines recommend rapid blood pressure lowering with intravenous antihypertensives and continuous monitoring in an intensive care unit (ICU), many patients are managed in intermediate care (IMC) settings. In this study, we compare outcomes of hypertensive emergency patients admitted to ICU vs IMC settings.
METHODS: Adult patients in the emergency departments of 3 hospitals were included if they had 2 or more systolic blood pressure measurements greater than 180 mm Hg within 12 hours of one another, were treated with continuous intravenous antihypertensive medications, and were subsequently admitted to an ICU or IMC setting. We excluded patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the emergency department and those presenting with acute coronary syndrome, aortic dissection, or acute cerebrovascular accident. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS) penalized for death and adjusted for baseline patient features. Secondary outcomes included ICU and IMC LOS and hospital mortality. Process outcomes included arterial line usage, frequency of blood pressure measurements in the first 24 hours, and escalations of care. Lastly, we report the proportion of patients reaching blood pressure targets and/or episodes of hypotension in each setting.
RESULTS: Intensive care unit patients (n = 649) were younger, with a male predominance, more frequently received noninvasive respiratory support and were dialysis dependent than IMC patients (n = 629). In an adjusted analysis, there was no difference in time to hospital discharge between patients admitted to ICU vs IMC settings (absolute difference: +0.29 days; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in ICU vs IMC LOS, hospital readmission rate, or hospital mortality. Blood pressures were more frequently measured in the ICU, but there was no difference in time to target blood pressure goal. Any hypotensive episode in the first 24 hours was more common in the ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective observational study of patients with hypertensive emergency, we did not observe significantly different LOS outcomes between patients admitted to ICU vs IMC settings or detect a signal of harm among those admitted to IMC. Intermediate care settings may be a reasonable alternative to ICU admission for select patients with hypertensive emergency.
PMID:41915559 | DOI:10.1093/annalsats/aaoaf048