Br J Surg. 2025 Dec 24;113(1):znaf279. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf279.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aortic arch pathologies are complex to treat. Alternatives include open surgery, hybrid surgery (endovascular aortic stent-grafting and open surgical debranching procedures) and total endovascular solutions with branched stent-grafts. Branched stent-grafts are the mainstream approach for endovascular repair, but they are primarily available only as dedicated custom-made devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a non-customized modular aortic arch stent-graft.
METHOD: This trial was led by the Chinese PLA General Hospital and 16 additional aortic centres in China. All included patients were treated with a non-customized modular inner branched stent-graft (Endonom Medtech, Hangzhou, China). The study endpoints were 30-day death and stroke, technical success, clinical success, early and late complications, reintervention, and death during follow-up. Follow-up via clinical examination and CT angiography scan were scheduled post surgery at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: From June 2021 to December 2024, a total of 88 patients were enrolled in this study. Technical success rate was 100%. The mean follow-up was 28.6 ± 11.7 months. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 3%, and the 30-day stroke rate was 9%. Overall survival was 91% ± 3%, 86% ± 4%, and 81% ± 4% at 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. A total of 10 patients developed endoleaks, none of which required reintervention.
CONCLUSION: Modular branched stent-graft repair for aortic arch disease is feasible and with comparative rates of safety with custom made branched endovascular stent-grafts, hybrid techniques and open surgery. Long-term comparative effectiveness studies are required to establish whether it is superior to alternative interventions.
PMID:41511869 | DOI:10.1093/bjs/znaf279