Cardiorespiratory fitness in working adults undergoing rehabilitation: the role of lifestyle and body composition- a cross-sectional study

Scritto il 05/06/2026
da Natalia Chróścielewska

Front Physiol. 2026 May 20;17:1806806. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1806806. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is one of the most important predictors of mortality and morbidity. Lifestyle changes concerning diet, sleep, physical activity (PA), and substance use have a systemic impact and can prevent 80% of premature deaths and chronic diseases. CRF, being a parameter dependent on the functioning of all systems, may therefore be affected by changes in lifestyle.

AIM: To examine the relationship between declared lifestyle (eating habits, alcohol use, smoking, sleep, weekly PA and body composition) and CRF.

METHODS: A sleep questionnaire based on Polish version of the Athens Insomnia Scale, dietary and substance survey from the PaLS study and a PA survey based on the IPAQ-SF were conducted. Body composition was assessed using a bioelectrical impedance analysis device, with particular focus on body fat percentage and skeletal muscle mass. The Åstrand-Rhyming fitness test was used to estimate VO2max. Spirometry was performed to assess pulmonary function, with results including FVC (% predicted), FEV1 (% predicted), and the FEV1/FVC ratio (% predicted).

RESULTS: Self-reported weekly PA was positively correlated with estimated VO2max (ρ=0.23389; p= 0.0012). Night sleep duration was associated with higher estimated VO2max (ρ =0.17976; p=0.0155). The frequency of consumption of plant-based protein was positively associated with estimated VO2max (ρ = 0.18917; p=0.0108).). Body fat percentage was independently associated with VO2max (B = -0.009, p=0.027). SMM% was independently associated with VO2max (B = 0.01452, p= 0.0372).

CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported weekly PA, longer sleep duration, and favorable body composition (lower body fat percentage, higher skeletal muscle mass percentage) were associated with higher VO2max. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to self-reported data on lifestyle and a submaximal VO2max test.

PMID:42245828 | PMC:PMC13229796 | DOI:10.3389/fphys.2026.1806806